jbpm - Suggest opensource BPM engine for low-latency service-task -

-

  • currently developed in-house workflow engine non-human tasks.
  • in average,my flow have 20 service-task support 100 tps per 1 host. ( 20 cores intel x86 server ). latency between task in near zero.
  • i'm consider opensource bpm engine replace mine more performance , gui design tool ,gui monitoring.
  • i have no experience in bpm, have researched of them, think focus on human-task. how latency between each service-task.
  • could give suggestion 1 suitable requirement?

consider eclipse stardust: https://www.eclipse.org/stardust/

if configure transient processes (or async writing of audit data) low latency possible.(see http://help.eclipse.org/mars/index.jsp?topic=%2forg.eclipse.stardust.docs.dev%2fhtml%2fconcepts%2faudit-trail%2ftransient-procs.html&cp=72_4_6_1)

we did benchmarks including deferred writing of audit data 20.000 messages per second. bottleneck @ point still oracle rac writing audit data. (see examples environments: https://wiki.eclipse.org/stardust/knowledge_base/infrastructure_system_administration_maintenance/hardware_and_sizing)

also see: knowledgebase: https://wiki.eclipse.org/stardust/knowledge_base


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

wireshark - USB mapping with python -

-
while reading ctf write-ups came across script #!/usr/bin/env python import struct import image import dpkt init_x, init_y = 100, 400 def print_map(pcap, device): picture = image.new("rgb", (1200, 500), "white") pixels = picture.load() x, y = init_x, init_y ts, buf in pcap: device_id, = struct.unpack("b", buf[0x0b]) if device_id != device: continue data = struct.unpack("bbbb", buf[-4:]) status = data[0] x = x + data[1] y = y + data[2] if (status == 1): in range(-5, 5): j in range(-5, 5): pixels[x + , y + j] = (0, 0, 0, 0) else: pixels[x, y] = (255, 0, 0, 0) picture.save("riverside-map.png", "png") if __name__ == "__main__": f = open("usb.pcap", "rb") pcap = dpkt.pcap.reader(f) print_map(pcap, 5) f.close() and ...
Read more

c++ - nodejs socket.io closes connection before upgrading to websocket -

-
i'm trying write c++ client talk websocket server written using nodejs , socket.io. can't c++ client establish websocket connection; server drops connection right after client requests http connection upgraded websocket. i used tcpdump watch packets going , forth. when use websocket server browser, works great , tcpdump output shows packets going , forth. when try connect server using c++ client, websocket connection never gets established. output tcpdump shows upgrade request being sent server followed server dropping connection. i tried replicating sequence of events using nc . connected server (running on port 8080) , copy-pasted exact set of headers sent browser, captured tcpdump. duplicate of working headers, connection dropped. there no output on server end indicating why connection gets dropped. here headers sent: get /socket.io/?type=player&eio=3&transport=websocket&sid=7mdclht_8ctsd6f4aaac http/1.1 host: localhost:8080 connection: upgrade prag...
Read more

Deploying Qt Application on Android is really slow? -

-
as may know there 3 ways deploy qt application on android : use ministro service install qt deploy local qt libraries temporary directory bundle qt libraries in apk the first method takes 30 seconds , needs install apk . ministro . second takes 1 minute me ! , anytime try run program qt creator pushes qt libraries device. third 1 makes .apk file big , again takes 1 minute me. think situation that's not reasonable develop android application using qt. there way make deploying process faster? almost full year since op , things have not changed @ all. deployment of 7 mb apk takes on minute , half project compiles in 5 seconds. reason answering not problem got resolved, offer alternative solution. i've implemented "workaround" consisting of 2 applications work in tandem - 1 on pc , 1 on device - created compile files remotely, turned out faster alternative deployment well. on host create application launches compilation in separate process, when do...
Read more